As unemployment remains at an alarming high, we continue to listen to government increasingly gloat on how it is falling. All the while ignore the ever increasing emigration rate (89,000 last year) and the growing number of people being forced to participate in the constantly expanding “work and training placement” schemes. These include two schemes implemented by this government themselves, namely
In the eyes of many, these schemes (as well as government’s continued fuelling of other similar schemes) are not only ways to massage unemployment figures (re-categorise in order to portray a “drop in unemployment”, rather than find a solution), but also a way to mask the holes being left in public service bodies due to cuts, and employment embargoes. Backing is given to this theory by
-
the government’s lack of action tackling the exploitation of these schemes as “free/cheap labour” by companies (as well as government departments themselves, who know they have NO ability to retain any of these “interns” full time)
-
Schools and other bodies being left with no alternative than to use these schemes to fill gaps left in their service
-
Forcing people to work far below the minimum wage government so vehemently shouted for on entering power.
-
Increasing a supposed “Internship” to 18 months,
as well as many others.
There are many gripes to be had with the spinning of figures, and playing on reports to suit a certain agenda. And this could, and has formed many discussions on their own. But let’s look on the other side of that. How does government’s plans to increase employment read?
Continue reading →